> Back in the bad old days when I was forced to use Visual Source Safe for version control
Sounds interesting. So was this basically a team of 'bandits' secretly using a non-endorsed VCS to collaborate and get shit done, and then pushing to VSS to keep the pointy-haired boss happy?
Hmm... I suppose the answer is yes. We got permission from our director to use CVS (at the time we were banned from using anything with a GPL license, so we had to cover our asses to a certain degree). There was a corporate mandate to store everything in VSS at some point, but I don't think anyone actually cared what you did before it was stored in VSS.
As you might imagine (the use of GPL software banned, the use of MS software enforced), the rules were politically rather than technically oriented. There were rumours that we had an agreement with MS to follow these rules and I wouldn't say it was out of the question. By and large as long as you followed the letter of rules nobody cared much after that. Using CVS was rather a major coup, though, given the GPL licence.
Possibly younger people will be amazed at the ridiculous conditions some people worked under back then. After I left that position I swore I would never agree to work with restrictions like that. In fact, the ability to work on free software is one of the first things I bring up as important to me in a job interview. Even a slight hesitation is enough to make me walk.
Sounds interesting. So was this basically a team of 'bandits' secretly using a non-endorsed VCS to collaborate and get shit done, and then pushing to VSS to keep the pointy-haired boss happy?