Hacker Timesnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

We should not use the entire planet, this would eliminate all woods and animals. Didn't say we had a food problem. Never said it's only good for advanced nations. Third world, sure, but account for the child mortality rate :(

Also please note that this should be the insensitive not forcing people, or taking any unfair rulings.

Who's lives are made better: everyones I guess (except those who enjoy big crowds). Expatiation of infrastructure? Not needed. Extra inflation of fossil fuels (while we still use them) due to more consumption, reduced well limited.Also helps on population (while still burning stuff, and using non degradable products like plastic). You will also be able to afford not living in a apartment easier since there is just more room for everyone. Ground prices reduce (there are cases where the house you build on the ground are as expensive as the ground itself !)

There are probably some advantages at population increase, but I can't think of any at the moment. But I'd like to hear them.

I'm more thinking along the lines, why do we need more population ? (Well of-course some might want to have more children and we should let them.)



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: