In California, teachers do a lot of under-handed lw brainwashing of their kids, at least at the high school I went to in the south bay in NorCal. We would always get told pro union agenda's and I to me as a kid(I am just 21 now), all that meant to me was "My nice teachers are getting hurt by X, X is evil!" or at least it seemed to me. I was never aware that some of it was sometimes underhanded union distortion.
Note I have not implied pro/against for any issue. Just when I was made aware of this agenda which I thought was decentralized agony, it shocked me.
I grew up in NorCal, too; that was the opposite impression I got. Most of the teachers I had were relatively young, and hadn't been teaching for a very long time; my conversations with them - especially in high school - frequently included mentions of how often they'd be pink-slipped because the teachers' union - dominated by veteran, tenured teachers - would elect for pay raises instead of hiring more teachers. This meant growing class sizes, and the veteran teachers knew it.
We were certainly taught about the environment, how biodiversity is a good thing, etc., but I was hard-pressed to find a teacher that actually agreed with the teachers' union, and unions in general were typically portrayed in a neutral light at best.
I guess my perception is somewhat malformed due to memories, but your experiences line up with mine. I guess the f(x)(explanation) for the x I gave was incorrect.
I do remember a lot of my teachers being pink slipped, but I also do remember all the strikes, all the specific agenda pushing. It was covert in the sense that young kids do not have such sharp anti-manipulation senses formed.
Note I have not implied pro/against for any issue. Just when I was made aware of this agenda which I thought was decentralized agony, it shocked me.