So I can see this getting boring pretty fast, but whatever.. on reading the title I wondered "why!", and on reading the article I find a recommendation for nginx. The reason for this appears to be entirely due to licensing in modern (and more comparable) versions of Apache 2.x than anything technical. The article does not make that clear at all.
Apologies if you read so much negativity into my choice of words, it wasn't meant as an attack on OpenBSD, forking unmaintained software, or whatever else, just intended to point out a correction in the way probably half or more of readers will interpret the article – as some kind of indication that Nginx is technically somehow better than Apache
Its not entirely due to licensing. OpenBSD has security patches to Apache that weren't accepted plus the license change. OpenBSD has been maintaining their own branch until the switch.
Apologies if you read so much negativity into my choice of words, it wasn't meant as an attack on OpenBSD, forking unmaintained software, or whatever else, just intended to point out a correction in the way probably half or more of readers will interpret the article – as some kind of indication that Nginx is technically somehow better than Apache