Vagrant is a nice tool, but I don't like the closed-open source part of it. There are 289 open issues and 79 open pull requests on github right now. It feels like there is a huge community out there who want to move this project forward, but there is the bottleneck of having only one committer who wants to have too much control over it. It's fine and the author can do what he wants, but I'm wondering what the project could achieve if it was more open to contributions and more people could actively work on it.
As a user, looking at those 289 open issues with only one developer, I don't feel at all encouraged to open a new one or send a pull request, because I just see a huge pile of things that the committer will have to wade through before getting to mine.
Actually, the number of issues/pull requests is higher than usual right now. You're right that at the moment I'm a bottleneck. I'm looking to change that (I want to add more committers).
However, historically I think I've been very good about responding to issues rather quickly. Unfortunately, the past 6 weeks I've been quite bad at it as I've been focussing on something you'll hopefully see in a few weeks. Again, this highlights the problem of being a bottleneck.
And just to prove how cool @mitchellh is (or at least to prove the fact that he takes HN comments seriously), he has added another committer to Vagrant today.
As a user, looking at those 289 open issues with only one developer, I don't feel at all encouraged to open a new one or send a pull request, because I just see a huge pile of things that the committer will have to wade through before getting to mine.