What did I say that isn't true? Negative T&C gave me pause about trying Code School. This turned me off forever.
> The Free Weekend is offered to all users (past or present) as long as they don't currently have a subscription to Code School.
This is the only statement I see that differs from my interpretation of the T&C. The line in question, "Free Weekend is not available for current or past subscribers and is intended to allow new Code School users to sample the benefits of a Code School education."
How common is it for a current or past user to not have a disqualifying subscription? The wording makes it clear (intentionally or not) that the promo is for new users.
> Is that really unreasonable?
I didn't say it was unreasonable, but that the T&C as a whole appeared to me as overly negative for what they protect, 2 days of free content valued at $25.
Actually, I was wrong. The terms incorrectly stated that past subscribers couldn't have access to the Free Weekend. That's what was untrue and has now been fixed.
What did I say that isn't true? Negative T&C gave me pause about trying Code School. This turned me off forever.
> The Free Weekend is offered to all users (past or present) as long as they don't currently have a subscription to Code School.
This is the only statement I see that differs from my interpretation of the T&C. The line in question, "Free Weekend is not available for current or past subscribers and is intended to allow new Code School users to sample the benefits of a Code School education."
How common is it for a current or past user to not have a disqualifying subscription? The wording makes it clear (intentionally or not) that the promo is for new users.
> Is that really unreasonable?
I didn't say it was unreasonable, but that the T&C as a whole appeared to me as overly negative for what they protect, 2 days of free content valued at $25.