I understand Apple investors wanting to know more about his condition. If they want to pursue that, I think they're justified. But there's a big difference between spreading gossip and exercising one's shareholder rights.
Yes, Steve Jobs gave up his expectation of the level of privacy you or I enjoy when he became the CEO of a massively successful, publicly traded company. But that doesn't mean that it's right to violate his privacy.
If you are an Apple shareholder trying to exercise your rights, that's fine. But 99% of the stuff written about Jobs' condition feels intrusive, and I would feel uncomfortable writing it myself.
Yes, Steve Jobs gave up his expectation of the level of privacy you or I enjoy when he became the CEO of a massively successful, publicly traded company. But that doesn't mean that it's right to violate his privacy.
If you are an Apple shareholder trying to exercise your rights, that's fine. But 99% of the stuff written about Jobs' condition feels intrusive, and I would feel uncomfortable writing it myself.