Hacker Timesnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

How does this compare the building your own bot that has access to these tools: - web plugin - api access to messaging - access to a job scheduler


This has been my approach and of course what you lose is the "random and surprising" (maybe good) but also the "evolutionary" aspect.

So, if you write strong tooling (even with AI) around the connection points - you can create blackboxes tht are secure and only allow the agent to perform certain actions. The blackbox email service calls out to a secure store (for keys/etc) and accesses your emails in a read-only way, etc (for example).

Everything is then much more intentional. You're writing tools for your agent but you also can't do fun or evolutionary things which is most of the fun behind OpenClaw. That and many people seem to genuinely see them as 'pets' or 'strange Ai friends' but that's a different problem and it's due to the interesting methods OpenClaw uses to give the illusion of intelligence, always on, and memories. These are all well know (variations on RAG, markdowns, etc)


Thanks for sharing. This seems to me like a more useful approach than an agent that has full control over a computer




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: