Hacker Timesnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> AI might give them good reasons for pros and cons.

This is what lawyers do, in their briefs and oral arguments before the court.



True. But if I was a judge I might want to consult AI to get a "neutral" opinion.


AI "neutrality" is a mirage. Hopefully the Supreme Court justices are smart enough to know that.


Hopefully. If they are smart they know that everybody can be wrong, therefore it is good to hear differing opinions and argumentation from multiple sources, in important matters.


Yes, that’s why they have lawyers submit briefs and make oral arguments.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: