Thank god we are too small to even be a consideration for that - we are the "AI datacenter in orbit before Google" race which is a little more doable with just a few engineers in a 15-large company.

Unless you mean Golden Dome could be a risk to our project, which is already an obvious thing.

I think the obvious exit strategy for a startup like that is to get acquired by a defense corp.

I think you just try to shoehorn the Golden Dome into every single conversation. You didn't explain why it was relevant to their work or why their discussion would be important.

Why do you reply to every single comment on hackernews about Golden Dome with some defensive or downright warmongering assertion? What stake do you have in that program?