The article is not conclusive on whether it was TDD or just plain automated testing that provided the benefits.
I've heard good arguments against TDD, but I haven't heard any good arguments against automated testing. (Other than situations where automating a process is cumbersome, like hardware bugs.)
I've heard good arguments against TDD, but I haven't heard any good arguments against automated testing. (Other than situations where automating a process is cumbersome, like hardware bugs.)