Hacker Timesnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

iOS 6 won't run with most features on 2 year old hardware. Windows Phone 8 - Won't run on < 1 year old hardware. ICS Can run, but doesn't because of carriers.

They're all shite.



iPhone 3GS will be 3 years old when iOS 6 is released.

iPhone 4 will be 2 years old. It will only lack Siri, FaceTime over cellular network and support for 'Made for iPhone' hearing aids.

I wouldn't call that 'most features'.


The problem is it's dickery, pure and simple. There is no technical reason those add ons can't run on the 4-non-S. I'm running a freaking Siri app from Cydia and it works just as well as the real thing. The battery life isn't reduced any appreciable amount, the phone isn't slower or more prone to running out of memory.

Yes yes I know Apple doesn't owe people free upgrades. It still bugs me.


Welp... Pogue's point is really proven now.


iPad 1 released in 2010 (two years old) lacks all features. iPhone 4 lacks turn by turn navigation, 3D maps, Siri, and Facetime over cellular.

So I get what with an iPhone 4? Passbook, Facebook, and a maps app that no longer tells me what train I can take?

Im going to have to stick to the most features.


> So I get what with an iPhone 4?

The ability to run apps targeting iOS 6 and above, which is arguably more important than everything else you listed.


Agreed.


>They're all shite.

A really big "jump to conclusions".

First of all, all of those are marvels of technology, a state of the art unbelievable even 10 years ago, and would be considered pure Star Trek level technology 20 years ago.

Second,

(a): not being able to run with SOME features (where did you got thay "with most" features from?) on "2 year old hardware" is not the same at all to (b): "not being able to run at all on < 1 year all hardware" or (c): "could run, but will not because of carriers".


What's so bad about replacing the phone every couple years? I'd rather these phone manufacturers moved things forward than worry too much about what the non early adopter crowd think. You don't have to update to ios6, nothing's forcing you too.

You write as though your phone came with some kind of guarantee it would support future software.

Just because you can't upgrade to iosX doesn't make what you have shite.


Well, besides an environment impact, and the fact that we're running out of resources and should be trying to get the most out of these devices?

No, I don't. I'm listing the three competitor OS's and explaining that they all suck.

Yes, it does. Because there is nothing wrong with the device from a technological standpoint, and it most certainly can handle the tasks. There are a few new things in iOS 6 that are going to be rolled into almost every new application, and they aren't in iOS5. So as a developer, I can either use Apples version and reduce my headaches by 1000 fold, or I can support iPad 1. This means that the list of available software is going to diminish significantly.


Up voted you elsewhere, but you're claiming that flagship 2012 software features could or should fit into a device sporting a single core ARM processor with 256MB of RAM and a GPU that is verging on obsolescence. We're an order of magnitude further out in performance AND userbase, and a trillion dollar market is up for grabs. This is the new life cycle.


I can't think of any useful phone features that should require more than 1Mb of RAM and an 8Mhz 68k processor core.


Not every feature, sure. But there are a lot of features that don't have an increased hardware requirement. I know this because I use TomTom turn by turn on the iPhone 4 right now, same maps data that's on iOS 6. I also use video calling ove 3g on the iPhone 4. So yea, it's a little hard to swallow why these features are being excluded, well except for the money. I'd even accept 3 years for a tablet, but not two.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: