> However, in the stage of capitalism we are currently in
This is, again, deeply deluded and detached from reality.
People always fight those who hold them back. This applies to employees fighting bosses, children fighting parents, companies fighting regulators, citizens fighting corrupt governments, and different bureaucrats fighting each other in socialist and communist systems.
It's blindingly obvious that this phenomenon isn't specific to capitalism, and outright false to claim that it wouldn't happen in any other economic system. (and, in fact, it would be much worse in command economies, as history clearly shows)
> Capitalism at its current stage is just a giant fire-sale
Again: there's no "at its current stage" - there is corruption in government that has allowed bad actors to run rampant. The fact that tens of thousands of companies are behaving reasonably trivially disproves your claim that this is a "stage". This is bad actors, which have always existed, and always will continue to exist, that are now less checked than usual because of regulatory failure.
> we also need to think whether a system that produces statements like this
...which proves decisively that you have no idea what you're talking about. This is not an argument - this is emotional pleading.
That describes a lot of your posts, actually - pleading. Because there are no logical points made, just a lot of emotionally manipulative, trivially-false statements.
> will work my best to dismantle it and throw it in the past
...and there's the activism, which comes with the typical lack of understanding of reality that is common to proponents for communism.
You should visit North Korea for yourself and see how alternative systems to capitalism actually work.
The fact that you got mad when I called you out in a response[1] and proceeded to stalk my other comment threads to personally attack me conclusively proves that you're not interested in debate or reason, just pushing your own ideological agenda. I have no responsibility to respond to you. Your opinions and arguments are invalid, because you're shown that you're willing to resort to stalking and personal attacks against those you do not like.
1) You've got your chronology and causality wrong[1]. No, I did not "stalk [your] other comment threads" after my other response to you.
2) And no, pointing out flawed logic in an argument is not a "personal attack".
3) My interests and motivations don't affect the validity of my arguments. I just said that assertions aren't proofs (here), and that working for a particular employer is a choice, not mandatory (elsewhere, at your link above). Hitler could say either of those, and it would still be correct. So could Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, Emperor Bokassa, Donald Trump, Joe Biden, or Churchill. See how it has nothing to do with ideology?
4) What you claim are "proofs" are still just assertions, and working for a particular employer is still a choice. You were wrong, that is all.
___
[1]: I think I've replied to you exactly twice before, and you posted this exact same (apart from the link) response to both. Since what you're saying is either "you attacked me elsewhere, and then followed me here!" or "you attacked me here, and then followed me elsewhere!", it's confusing as Hell. Which is supposed to be "elsewhere", and which "here"? It even took me a while to realise both links were valid, and not some weird loop... (I was beginning to speculate whether Dan G had moved one sub-thread or both into some offshoot. That is, after I realised they are two separate sub-threads in the first place.)
This is, again, deeply deluded and detached from reality.
People always fight those who hold them back. This applies to employees fighting bosses, children fighting parents, companies fighting regulators, citizens fighting corrupt governments, and different bureaucrats fighting each other in socialist and communist systems.
It's blindingly obvious that this phenomenon isn't specific to capitalism, and outright false to claim that it wouldn't happen in any other economic system. (and, in fact, it would be much worse in command economies, as history clearly shows)
> Capitalism at its current stage is just a giant fire-sale
Again: there's no "at its current stage" - there is corruption in government that has allowed bad actors to run rampant. The fact that tens of thousands of companies are behaving reasonably trivially disproves your claim that this is a "stage". This is bad actors, which have always existed, and always will continue to exist, that are now less checked than usual because of regulatory failure.
> we also need to think whether a system that produces statements like this
...which proves decisively that you have no idea what you're talking about. This is not an argument - this is emotional pleading.
That describes a lot of your posts, actually - pleading. Because there are no logical points made, just a lot of emotionally manipulative, trivially-false statements.
> will work my best to dismantle it and throw it in the past
...and there's the activism, which comes with the typical lack of understanding of reality that is common to proponents for communism.
You should visit North Korea for yourself and see how alternative systems to capitalism actually work.