You're implying you have knowledge of the subject, so rather than just a short dismissal, perhaps you could satiate our curiosity with some of your knowledge and/or some links to some non-awful information that you approve of?

Wikipedia. Probably any of the first page results on Google would be better than this.

How do you know which source is more accurate, if any of them are?

My point is that nearly any mainstream source will be better than this article, it's that bad.

Indeed, the last paragraph seems totally made up. The whole panel was stolen, not half of it. And Goedertier never demanded any ransom, the thief did but the article assumes he's definitely the thief. It's still unclear whether he was involved, he was a suspect because during the final minutes of his life, he mumbled some words about being the only person who knows where the stolen panel is.

The paragraph in question, for posterity:

>The artwork was stolen yet again in 1934 by stockbroker and businessman Arsène Goedertie. He sent a group of men to the cathedral one evening to steal the bottom left panel known as The Just Judges. Goedertie had sliced the panel in half, leaving the other half for the police to find, and demanded a ransom for the panel. The Belgian Minister refused, so the panel is still missing to this day. You can still check out the entire 12-panel Ghent Altarpiece on display, with an impressive replica of the missing panel.