> While the quality of images has improved a lot, if you have something specific and moderately complex in mind it's still very hard to get there just from a textual prompt.
I think this gets to an important point. If whoever is paying the bills has something very specific in mind, they won't be happy with AI (or frankly many artists) at this point. But as a creative interpretation of something more general, it's actually really good, and I think with many low-importance works like the author describes as "furniture" - we really don't need to be that exact.
I think this gets to an important point. If whoever is paying the bills has something very specific in mind, they won't be happy with AI (or frankly many artists) at this point. But as a creative interpretation of something more general, it's actually really good, and I think with many low-importance works like the author describes as "furniture" - we really don't need to be that exact.