My comparison was crude. I know there are finer nuances, such as BCC income probably being much more passive than HNM.
I just don't think it is a particularly wise move when more attractive markets abound.
The irony of that coming from the maker of bingo software is not lost on me :-P
In any case, I'm sorry if I misunderstood and misrepresented your advice.
EDIT: It occurred to me that my snide remark regarding the irony could also do with a disclaimer. I'm implying that you yourself chose BCC over other attractive markets. However, I know you did that at a time it made sense to you given your circumstances. You have since moved towards more attractive markets (AR). This example clearly highlights the problem with advice. Unless it is seen in the context of the adviser's whole spectrum of experience, it can be really misleading and confusing.
I just don't think it is a particularly wise move when more attractive markets abound.
The irony of that coming from the maker of bingo software is not lost on me :-P
In any case, I'm sorry if I misunderstood and misrepresented your advice.
EDIT: It occurred to me that my snide remark regarding the irony could also do with a disclaimer. I'm implying that you yourself chose BCC over other attractive markets. However, I know you did that at a time it made sense to you given your circumstances. You have since moved towards more attractive markets (AR). This example clearly highlights the problem with advice. Unless it is seen in the context of the adviser's whole spectrum of experience, it can be really misleading and confusing.