Hacker Timesnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

My understanding of Godels is that it only implies that a super system will always be required to explain certain results in a base system.

Which does not refute out ability to model nature.



I never said it refutes our ability to model nature. I said it seems to refute the idea that nature itself runs on mathematics. Because what is the super system of nature?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: