Is that satire or acknowledging the fact that Paxlovid isn't really that great at preventing adverse outcomes? Poe's Law applies again, it's quite impossible to tell, but then with satire you are not supposed to be able to tell.
The early studies were with Paxlovid in unvaccinated patients, where it worked pretty good. But by now everyone is vaccinated and/or has caught the pestilence several times over, and efficacy against severe disease and death is much less clear-cut. It still provides benefit in the elderly, but not in the rest of the population.
