Hacker Timesnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

>Incidentally, I think this is the best way to start a business if you ever find yourself in the right position. Big companies are ditching / spinning off successful products which are just not "successful enough" and you can often pick them up for the cost of supporting existing customers.

I surely would hope that the same think had happened to several of the Google services that were killed a short time ago; specially Wave and Code Search.

Although I know that at least Wave was made given to Apache, I think what that needed was a company that was willing to polish and provide the service.



Problem with that is two things:

1: Those products are build to run on Googles infrastructure, which you can't have if you're not Google.

2: Those products don't have customers, they have users. That makes spinning a profitable business off much harder.


>1: Those products are build to run on Googles infrastructure, which you can't have if you're not Google.

Not necessarily. At least with Google Wave [1], Google ensured that they made the necessary modifications to allow users to run Wave servers by themselves. There is at least one provider running wave-in-a-box [2], and there isn't any reason that this provider should be the only one.

>2: Those products don't have customers, they have users. That makes spinning a profitable business off much harder.

Harder yes, but it's still well short of impossible. I was thinking that the Wave Federation Protocol could perhaps be monetized as a shared-editing/collaboration service. It could be positioned as a combination of Sharepoint and chat.

[1] http://googlewavedev.blogspot.com/2010/09/wave-open-source-n...

[2] http://waveinabox.net/


The mechanism the OP referred to was picking up an existing product and providing a more or less uninterrupted user experience. It's a great benefit for a start-up to be able to hit the ground running with a user base and traction.

In the case of Wave, there was a major gap between the product being declared EOL from Google and until the various bits and pieces for running Wave as an independent vendor was in place - and in that gap all reasonable people ran away, so non-Google Wave offerings are starting from scratch.

As for money, no, certainly not impossible, but it's one more hurdle to hitting the ground running.


Wave, or at least something using the same ideas and specs, has been spun into several commerical products.




Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: