Will you accept peer-reviewed papers by other authors?
There are multiple types of health risks associated with the experimental covid shots (billions of doses administered globally and often repeatedly to the same individuals before clinical trials have been completed doesn't make them less experimental, but it does raise the stakes of the experiment).
Here, I will consider a single known and admitted adverse effect of some of the covid shots, particularly the mRNA products: myocarditis.
A relatively small number of deaths have been grudgingly admitted, particularly among younger males who are at very low risk from covid itself but have been coerced into receiving these shots in order to attend school, university, participate in activities, or to obtain and retain employment. But we have been (falsely) assured by experts and authorities that myocarditis sufferers who don't actually die during the acute phase of their illness make a full recovery and suffer no lasting ill effects.
The only problem is that this is not true.
Long-term prospects of myocarditis sufferers are not well-characterized. And there's very, very little interest in studying the issue now, but here's a paper accepted by a journal just before covid went big globally: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14017431.2021.1...
From the abstract:
Myocarditis in younger patients without prior cardiac disease was associated with a long-term excess risk of HF hospitalization, and death, even in patients free of events and HF medication 1 year after discharge.
As we know, correlations between use of drugs like Vioxx and Chantix with, respectively, doubled risk of strokes and heart attacks and increased risk of cancer were enough to get them pulled from the market. But governments didn't relentlessly promote and coerce their citizens into taking Vioxx and Chantix en masse or waive liability for those products' manufacturers.
We're witnessing a large increase in non-covid excess deaths of young-to-middle-aged persons in countries with high covid shot uptake and the same experts who rammed those shots down everyone's throat, coordinated a censorship campaign to muffle anyone expressing legitimate concerns, hounded dissenting medical professionals and scientists out of their jobs, etc. is extremely baffled and thinks maybe it's related to climate change.
There are so many bizarre jumps in logic here it's actually impossible to address. All I can say is you need to speak to an actual (or better yet, several) epidemiologists about vaccine efficacy and the efficacy of the covid vaccines.
For anyone impressionable reading, I just want to point out:
> We're witnessing a large increase in non-covid excess deaths of young-to-middle-aged persons in countries with high covid shot uptake
