No. That comment isn't really addressed at you; it's addressed at our readers. It's just that people with your parochial (in the literal sense) educational background (which I can infer clearly from your comments) habitually accuse others of ignorance, from a position of relative ignorance. I don't think this is a moral failing on your part or anything; it's just something we see all the time, and eventually you kind of just have to find it funny. Once you identify this response as a component of the state-secular-education-instilled memetic defense mechanism, it's funny to see its (frequently ironic) activation.
> ... habitually accuse others of ignorance, from a position of relative ignorance
Yes, ignorant people do sometimes accuse others of ignorance.
Consider this: If I tell someone their shoe is untied, even though my shoe was untied sometime last week, does that make me a hypocrite? No.
It is also true that people can be ignorant about different things. Minh might tell Alex he is ignorant about some topic. Alex might tell Minh she is ignorant about some other topic. No problem there. Neither is being hypocritical.
P.S. Telling someone else they are ignorant tends to not go well, but if it is done carefully and kindly, it doesn't have to be a bad thing.
Please define how you are using "parochial (in the literal sense)". Here's a common definition:
pa·ro·chi·al | pəˈrōkēəl | adjective
relating to a church parish: the parochial church council.
• having a limited or narrow outlook or scope: this worldview seems incredibly naive and parochial.
