Hacker Timesnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I dont think that is obvious at all, given the broad oversight over emissions given to the EPA.

Furthermore, I think looking at the recent decisions to uphold gerrymandered maps in Alabama and Louisiana should without a shadow of a doubt prove how partisan the court is.

And they can't claim to be "literalist" or "originalist" when deciding that border patrols duties are more important than the 4th ammendment



Both parties engage in gerrymandering whenever they get the chance.


Uhh, yeah, but this is the Supreme Court who, if you look at the rest of this thread, people are claiming is "non partisan"

So if the supreme court is doing it then they're partisan QED

Also, please, one side is doing much more voter suppression than the other


Dems attempted to stop gerrymandering entirely by creating an independent districting body with the bill HR1, but were blocked from doing so.




Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: