It just isn't a very interesting critique in and of itself. If the OP was pointing out how their ideological outlook influenced the facts presented in the story, or how they left some complicating factor out, then it would be useful. However C.J. Ciaramella, the author of the piece has a long history and good track record of reporting on police misconduct, and civil rights abuses. Moreover the article is covering reporting originally done by WXYZ Detroit, so it not even originally from Reason, they just picked it up for their audience.

My overarching point is that unless you can point to the ideology of the publication negatively influencing the reporting it's just lazy and useless criticism.