Remember when every person and their peer believed that the earth was flat and it was the center of the universe?
This is simply not true. It was a popular position at one stage, but it wasn't "everyone thought it so".
Also, your scientific process does not allow for fields such as taxonomy or anatomy - you don't construct a hypothesis nor test it in fields like this.
Science is about rigorous observation. Peer-review provides a strong part of that rigor.
This is simply not true. It was a popular position at one stage, but it wasn't "everyone thought it so".
Also, your scientific process does not allow for fields such as taxonomy or anatomy - you don't construct a hypothesis nor test it in fields like this.
Science is about rigorous observation. Peer-review provides a strong part of that rigor.