Being peer-reviewed is a joke - especially when it is so easy to falsify or hide data, as was done in ClimateGate.

Being peer-reviewed is also a joke when your peers all sip the same cool-aid.

You did not answer my question, where did you get your information that the scientists have not tried to disprove the warming theories?

I'm going to repaste this for the sake of convenience:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_scientists_opposing_the...

If any study can address all of the concerns quoted here, I'll shut my mouth.

In the face of some of gaping inconsistencies, I would think that many studies did not try to question their hypotheses thoroughly enough.

You admitted in anther thread that you don't even know what ClimateGate was about, yet you cite it again. #fail