> while picking on the small guys because they could Are you suggesting that... | Hacker News

Hacker Timesnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		pyre on June 9, 2011 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Apple Reverses Course On In-App Subscriptions `> while picking on the small guys because they could` Are you suggesting that Apple wasn't approving new updates from smaller players because they didn't follow a policy that wasn't in effect yet?

recoiledsnake on June 9, 2011 [–]

Yes, that is what Apple was doing.

m_eiman on June 10, 2011 | [–]

Reference?

recoiledsnake on June 10, 2011 | | [–]

http://techcrunch.com/2011/03/15/apple-kindle-netflix-in-app...

m_eiman on June 10, 2011 | | [–]

"The big questions: is Apple playing favorites? ... It’s still wait-and-see, but this looks promising."

Doesn't seem like evidence of them doing anything other than allowing the big players to update their apps as usual?

Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4
Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact