So you say you suspect they have an ongoing investigation, and that would be "circumstances where every half competent organization would decline comment"
What substantiates this conclusion? They can have an investigation ongoing, and share the cause for said investigation. In the statement they explicitly establish that this doesn't imply guilt of the account owner.
What substantiates this conclusion? They can have an investigation ongoing, and share the cause for said investigation. In the statement they explicitly establish that this doesn't imply guilt of the account owner.
Why are you so triggered by this clarification?