Hacker Timesnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Why would "bioterrorism scale" & "pandemic scale" be different, especially if a bioterror agent was crafted to be contagious (& thus create pandemic conditions)?


A bioterrorist cell would not have the resources to craft a perfectly engineered biological weapon. They'd be more likely to have access to limited quantities of some pre-existing biological agent (like anthrax, say). So what you'd see in that scenario is attacks that cause a bunch of casualties in a few locations in one big splash, and then quickly peter out after that.

It's like, what's the difference between a terrorist nuclear attack and a full-scale nuclear war? In the former scenario, you're talking a small number of low-yield devices triggered in one country; the rest of the world still stands able to provide assistance. In the latter scenario, there's nobody left to help who hasn't also been blown to ashes.


I think you would re-evaluate this reasoning after watching the show ‘Jericho’.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jericho_(2006_TV_series)


Just to add, but why would a bioterror agent not be crafted to be contagious?

Spread is the big differential on bioterror, and most other forms of terrorism do not require a team with members that have 2 PHDs each.




Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: