Hacker Timesnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> “Organic” had several clear meanings and has not lost any, however it has gained another clear meaning and people who use it don’t seem to see a problem.

Well putting aside the fact that the new meaning is anything but clear, this is just demonstrably untrue. There’s no such thing as an inorganic carrot, but you can not describe a carrot as being organic unless it is certified as such by the USDA (or whatever other certifying body), according to their unique criteria that have no relation at all to the carrots organicness.

> Can you show that consumers are unduly prejudiced by the current system?

Try googling a simple definition of “organic”. Google will tell you “produced or involving production without the use of chemical fertilizers, pesticides, or other artificial chemicals.” Everything about that definition is false according to any organic certification program (regardless of what you think an “artificial chemical” is...)



"Organic" with respect to agricultural goods is a term of art defined by law.

"Inorganic" is not a legally defined term with respect to agricultural goods, nor is it a scientifically meaningful term because carrots are made of organic materials (as "organic" is used scientifically). Thus, calling a food product "inorganic carrot" would either be fraudulent or deceptive under US and EU laws.

On the other hand, it is possible to have a "meat carrot" like Arby's did this summer, which consisted of carrot-shaped meat.

And it's certainly possible to have an iron carrot or a plastic carrot. Just not as a food product.

Context matters.




Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: