Certainly. I was the one who wrote that "the CEO is not a dictator".
This is trivially true as the CEO is not the authoritarian head of a country.
So I must have meant something a little hyperbolic.
I just don't know how to define that in any meaningful sense so as to be able to talk about it.
I don't know what mark I missed. I objected to the llukas' proposition that the CEO in a business "ultimately controls the project goals." I agree that in the US government, the chief executive does not have full control. I think it's meaningful point that the chief executive does not necessarily have final control.
Personally, I think it's a simpler story to talk about the CEO as some sort of heroic authoritarian leader, which is why we end up with those sorts of stories.
This is trivially true as the CEO is not the authoritarian head of a country.
So I must have meant something a little hyperbolic.
I just don't know how to define that in any meaningful sense so as to be able to talk about it.
I don't know what mark I missed. I objected to the llukas' proposition that the CEO in a business "ultimately controls the project goals." I agree that in the US government, the chief executive does not have full control. I think it's meaningful point that the chief executive does not necessarily have final control.
Personally, I think it's a simpler story to talk about the CEO as some sort of heroic authoritarian leader, which is why we end up with those sorts of stories.