Hacker Timesnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Doesn't it seem that acreage is more relevant?

(I didn't read the article)



Acreage doesn't tell you how much biomass there is. Imagine a 1m tall shrub with big leaves and not much underneath vs. a dense rainforest where the top canopy extends tens of metres up and there's massive undergrowth.

So I guess the answer it depends what you're trying to measure.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: