That's quite untrue, and a bit an impetuous conclusion to jump to. We work hard at doing our job professionally, including not moderating HN for ideological reasons.
Of course we have biases, but (a) we consciously work at suspending them, (b) they're probably not what you think they are, and (c) one cannot accurately assess another's bias by consulting one's own passions.
"Assault" weapon has never been used as in "assaulting" someone, but as in "a squad assaulting an enemy position", implying weapons capable of fully-automatic suppressive fire. Which really is nowhere what civilians can get access... unless you want to spend >$20k on a pre-1986 firearm.
> ... but technically, weed is still a schedule 1 drug, so he is a criminal.
So instead of charging him with any crimes, they just took his money? All the fun, without the need for that pesky innocent until proven guilty stuff? Nice.
> Most common adverse events consisted of chills, headache, fever, asthenia, injection-site pain, nausea, and vomiting. This safety profile is in agreement with those previously reported.8-11 However, one patient who achieved a very high anti-EGF antibody response together with a significant decrease in EGF concentration in sera developed a skin rash. After vaccination, this patient achieved a complete tumor remission, still sustained 44 months after random assignment.
He uses "Taliban" as an image for extremism, where some other would say "nazi". In this case, he refers to "fair use" extremist who want the latest episode of their favorite show never to buffer, even if this mean slowing down other.
