So like, resting?

Here's the original indictment: https://www.theregister.com/2021/12/02/nickolas_sharp_ubiqui...

It’s almost as though by allowing for this natural behavior, randomness gets more extreme (aims towards extremities). Wondering if there are ways this model collapses - for example, if any jump from one bar to the next gets too big (over a threshold), does that cause the whole model to collapse?

Ohhhhh, thank you! That makes sense. It seems there was an implicit assumption of 95% (p<0.05), is that right?

Right. 95% is the most common threshold for a CI.

Lower than general population or lower than the control group?

Yup, everyone publishes their public keys. No one’s private keys gets published (fake crush created).

I’m not sure if zero-knowledge proofs exist for love outside of action - repeated acts of commitment over time (to reduces the confidence that someone doesn’t love you).