Hacker Timesnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | squidsoup's commentslogin

Don't forget the deranged furries.

They're not all deranged! Some are completely productive, functional furries. Probably. Maybe.

Also, your statement is far too reductive! There's plenty of avatars with scales! Also, don't forget the anime girls that are actually middle-aged men and the occasional sentient burrito.


I prefer the remarkably -deep-voiced, tiny birds; the literal smoke alarms, and those who like to Pump Up the Jam, myself!

The suspiciously wealthy software developers, astronauts, pharmacists, game devs and artists that build high quality 3d models, Blender and Substance Painter tutorials and add-ons that prop up a good percentage of the VR headset market, Patreon market, and have a thriving artisan ecosystem?

Sure, but by furries for furries is a market. By normies, for... nobody? Isn't.

What do you expect? Did you see the movie ready player one? This kind of experience is ideal for furries and cosplay types and they featured in the movie too.

If you can be anything, it makes sense it attracts people who want to not be what they already are.


Not everyone likes in-ear headphones, so if you want something that works seamlessly across multiple devices, its the only option.

If you have multiple apple devices, the seamless switching is the killer feature, for me anyway. My Bose headphones were absolutely abysmal at this, and it drove me mad.

My Pixel buds from Google have been pretty good since they support Bluetooth multipoint. I'd love to find some good headphones like Beats or the airpods, but Apple doesn't seem to support those standards, it only works with other Apple devices.

The pro has the perfect form factor for sheet music. Absurd over kill in terms of other hardware, but there's really no alternative for musicians (other than paper).


> They don't pay $30K for slop art

I beg your pardon, but have you heard of Jeff Koons or Kaws?


> The feel of photos back then, was at least 100x stronger than now. They were a special item, could be given as a gift.

I think this is still true if you shoot film today.


> It's like you assigning to humans divine capabilities :) . Hyperbolizing a little, humans also only copy and mix - where do you think originality comes from? Granted, AI isn't at the level of humans yet, but they improve here.

Every human being is unique, both biologically and experientially. Until an AI can feel and have a lived experience, it can not create art.


There's nothing special about art re humans and it doesn't require feeling or lived experiences. That's an arbitrary wall you're putting up.


Demonstrably wrong. The most highly regarded AI artist today is Refik Adanol. His work was recently described by Jerry Saltz as a "glorified lava lamp".


I don't think this is a demonstration of impossibility, just a lack of demonstration of possibility.


Why should anyone care about either of those two people?


The art establishment clearly does. Refik has a show at MoMA at the moment. Saltz won a Pulitzer for his art criticism, so I guess the Pulitzer committee cares.


But normal people doesn't care about the art establishment, it has no impact on their lives, it could die tomorrow and almost nobody would notice.


Who said the bar here is normal people? Normal people, in any discipline, are definitionally not the ones who push the discipline forward.


Will smith eating spaghetti is art, sorry.


If everything is art, then nothing is art. Conceptual art, and everything that followed in Duchamp's wake, is mostly meaningless nonsense, sorry.


Fresh take


Prosecuting the working class, sure.


Foto is good, provided you want a community exclusively made up of other photographers. If you want greater reach for your work, Instagram unfortunately is still the only option.

The worst thing about Instagram today for photographers and artists, is that to succeed, you have to effectively become an influencer and share reels of yourself and your process.


> If you want greater reach for your work, Instagram unfortunately is still the only option.

Wasn't people wanting reach what supposedly ruined Instagram in the first place? Seems like wanting it both ways if you want reach for yourself, but not for "influencers"


There was a time on Instagram when artists could grow their reach organically, on the merit of their work alone, but I don’t think that’s possible today without engaging in reels and positioning yourself as an influencer, which most artists I would imagine find abhorrent.


That feature has been monetized, you now have to pay to spam other users with sponsored content or something like that.


I mean I want to enjoy some wine, doesn’t mean I’m a hypocrite for disliking alcoholics and drunk driving.

It’s OK to believe both 1) social media can be a useful service for connecting with friends and interesting people, and 2) social media has feedback mechanisms that reward unpleasant and abusive behavior.


A fan of ML, and rescript looks lovely, but sadly typescript is good enough for UI work.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: