Hacker Timesnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | parliament32's commentslogin

I presume it's from here:

> Notification Center shows your notifications history, allowing you to scroll back and see what you've missed.

https://support.apple.com/en-ca/108781

Note that although Android has a similar "notification history" feature, it's disabled by default and requires opt-in.


Why would it keep the notification history after they’ve been dismissed, though? There’s no user-facing way (that I’m aware of) to access a history of dismissed notifications.

Does it, or did the defendant just not dismiss them? Maybe if you delete the app, the notifications aren't dismissed.

Only a small sliver of the world has to worry about health insurance. Job security, maybe.

I think the biggest component is all the crap that comes with running a business.. accounting, sales, budgets and planning, regulatory concerns, office/site management, the list goes on forever. I'm an engineer, I want to do this and leave the other jobs to people who specialize at those, not run around trying to spin a dozen plates at once. I'm sure there's a tidbit more money to be made but it's just not worth it for me.

Now, if someone can make a vibe-business platform where AI handles all the drudgery and I can stick to the tech.. that might be worth talking about.


How could your "business" ever make money if any idiot with a $20 CC subscription can recreate it in a weekend? And no, "I can prompt better than them" is not a differentiator.

The idea is the opposite - "nobody" can make money selling software anymore, because software can be cheaply created by an LLM, so you want to start a business that previously would have had to buy software/software engineers in order to support some other product.

However, even if that holds true (which is a big if - right now I wouldn't want to run a business backed by vibe software), and even if there are enough such business ideas to go around, there's going to be quite a lot of turmoil in the meantime.


I don't think that's true. SW that works is still expensive to produce. SW that kind of works is super easy to do. The money is in making SW that works. You still need expertise for that.

There's a fallacy here around how software is fungible. WordPress hasn't made web developers obsolete, despite everybody having access to a $5/mo WYSIWYG-and-domains-and-hosting-bundle environment; quite the opposite, in fact.

I'm seeing the parent's point along these lines: "me and all my friends are starting businesses being the middlemen between WordPress and (people who want websites)". It's not that it won't work, it's just a shit business model.


Gyms still make money even though you can stay quite fit with just a good set of adjustable dumbbells, a bench, and a jump rope.

I think a closer analogy is paying for a personal trainer vs working out yourself. Some people find value in that, but not many.

It's the gym, the trainer, the social environment, and a million other things you wouldn't think of until you have boots on the ground, eg a language model can't sign a vendor liability contract. People thought the rise of the internet would kill gyms because anyone can download the routine for an Olympic athlete for free. Turns out access to information is not the same as execution. It happened multiple times with websites/apps/Peloton. Every time fitness culture skyrocketed and gyms have benefited.

  How could your "business" ever make money if any idiot with a $20 CC subscription can recreate it in a weekend? And no, "I can prompt better than them" is not a differentiator.
If you truly believe this, you'd invest every cent you have into Nvidia, TSMC, and energy companies.

We (the two of us) do fine with 95% Costco shopping, and I have similar "she won't commit to eating something specific for a week" restrictions. The only real tricks are get better at storage[1], and get better at cooking[2]. FWIW, the 2% rebate on the executive membership always covers my membership renewal price plus $50-$100 off a shop.

[1] Yes, you need somewhere to stuff 24 rolls of paper towels etc. I ended up building more shelves in the voids at the top of closets and the like. Ladder-access only but it works out.

[2] Stop doing 32-ingredient cooks with baby bok choy and white tomatoes and whatever other exotic instagram reels crap. Buy beef, chicken, fish, then portion and freeze (a vacuum-sealer is not necessary but it helps). Buy a standard 4-5 vegetables and a couple fruits. Potatoes and rice for carbs. Then figure out a list of recipes you can make from those ingredients -- I promise they can be combined damn near indefinitely.


I will admit that my situation is rare, but trust me when I say that your solutions would not be effective.

Your shed saga is a fantastic writeup, thank you for sharing.

Good checklist, but

> The actual development happens on a rented server

Why not Hyper-V or libvirt/KVM? VM escapes aren't a thing in real life (or VMs from hyperscalers wouldn't exist), so why deal with additional cost, latency, and third-party trust when you could just run it yourself?


Or even a container. Unless you’re a security researcher the average dev isn’t likely to encounter anything requiring anti escape anything at all

Both the article and repo[1] are slop.

[1] In the repo, the "reproduce" is just a bunch of print statements about what would happen, the bug isn't actually triggered: https://github.com/juxt/agc-lgyro-lock-leak-bug/blob/c378438...


The wall of slop after the single human paragraph, you mean? Text generator output isn't data.. it's at best unreliable, and at worst entirely fabricated.

Internally, we measured a regular developer consuming about $40/workday of compute on the $200/mo plan thresholds.

> There's no such thing as a "slop vulnerability"

https://daniel.haxx.se/blog/2025/07/14/death-by-a-thousand-s...

See the list at the bottom of the post for examples.


Those aren't vulnerabilities. You're missing the point.

Nobody is saying there's no such thing as a slop report. Not only are there, but slop vulnerability reports as a time-consuming annoying phenomenon predate LLM chatbots by almost a decade. There's a whole cottage industry that deals with them.

Or did. Obsolete now.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: