Hacker Timesnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | organsnyder's commentslogin

Would engineers purposefully game the metric, though?

I think the difference is that many data centers are being built as cheaply as possible, with no regards for noise prevention, their effect on the energy grid, etc. Data centers have been located near people for decades, but most of them are completely inconspicuous because they are designed to mitigate their effect on their surroundings.

Not to mention raising local temperatures by as much as 16°F

https://edition.cnn.com/2026/03/30/climate/data-centers-are-...


This smacks of sensationalism - we are talking very local temperatures, not like, the metro area went from 100 highs in summer to 116 because of a DC. And the “16” number was one specific DC in one study, and we don’t know what were the conditions before. We already knew 30 years ago that paved built areas are heat islands so if a green field is a data center with cooling fans it’s not scary or surprising that it emits heat that can be detected. It’s like any factory.

But I don’t see how local temperatures on the site of the DC itself is somehow an existential threat to people in the area unless their house is 50’ away from it.

At the end of the day NIMBYs always have their opinions about everything from views to noise to traffic, but there’s a limit to how much rights one has to control the property beyond one’s own land.


My challenge has been trying to manage my higher-level context. I've gotten a pretty good setup where I have project-level orchestrator agents that can spin up workers to implement tasks with minimal oversight, and the resulting work is usually quite good (especially after I give it the mandatory "make the comments less verbose" refining, etc.). But that means I'm doing even more context-switching. I've gotten to the point where I have a half-dozen draft PRs that just need my review before I tag my colleagues, and trying to dig up the context from all of those tasks can be paralyzing.

Maybe in some dystopian future. But right now there are still plenty of humans in the loop for supporting those machines.

This is one of the main reasons that Amazon is my default online merchant, despite all of my reservations with them: a purchase won't increase the amount of marketing email I receive. I don't know how much spam they send to new accounts, but I must have my preferences tweaked to eliminate most of it. Contrast that to every merchant that thinks that since I bought a product from them once, they should spam me multiple times per week, oftentimes even when I've unchecked the "receive marketing emails" box.

My Framework Desktop with 128GB was about half that. I did luck out by buying before RAM prices went crazy, though.

I'm looking forward to the fallout when the data center bubble bursts. There's a good possibility we'll see a glut of hardware, either on the used market or from manufacturers that no longer have massive orders from OpenAI and the like.


What's the context for bringing this up now? Looks like he was acquitted.


Looks like it’s a bot that just randomly picks different articles and reposts.


I use ChatGPT on occasion for certain tasks. But when I'm doing a web search, I want a web search without AI.

same!

my comment is not in support of google's ai search. or ai in general.

just pushing back on "ai is not popular", because it is obviously popular by any reasonable metric.


He runs the largest, most prominent company in the field, so it's not like it's off-topic.


It's not just giving a shit: it's also the capacity to act on giving a shit. I'm exhausted at the end of the day after getting the kids to bed, and I'm fortunate to be in a stable marriage, live in a large home that my wife and I own, and work a well-paying WFH job. I can only imagine how tiring it must be to not have those advantages.

There are the parents doing heroics that I can hardly imagine, and they should be celebrated. But we need to design a system that provides a sufficient level of support for those families that only have an average level of capacity.


> I can only imagine how tiring it must be to not have those advantages

Yes, you can only “imagine” what it’s like for people who are less comfortable than you. But that cuts both ways. It could be that you’re also “imagining” the barriers you think exist to people accessing charter schools. In particular, I suspect you’re incorrectly assuming that people work as much as you do, just for less money.


Actually, I can more than imagine it. I have friends that are in those situations, and help out when I can.


How difficult is it?

1. give a shit

2. enroll

3. ???

4. PROFIT!


Have you ever lived below the poverty line? In order to enroll, you’d have to know about it and manage logistics.

Working 14 hours a day so you can clothe and feed your kid doesn’t leave much time for that.

That doesn’t mean you don’t give a shit.


There are so many pieces of that step 3 in trying to navigate a school system that isn't accustomed to working with lower-income students.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: