Hacker Timesnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | mplewis's commentslogin

don't be a crank

Useful feedback thanks.

racist people don't get to talk in my spaces

If the history of the internet is to be any guide, it won't be the slog of racism that will shut something like this down, it will be a firehose of penis pictures.

Somewhere, someone will figure out how to create a bot that floods this with penis pictures, and that will be the end of it (or the beginning of the end, where a short period of anti-penis-pic defensive patches will be made until the software maintainers just give up)


Hot-dog-not-hot-dog

Why is that any of your business?

Hotwire doesn't work anywhere you can't guarantee a high-quality low-latency connection. Every UI interaction in Hotwire includes that round trip.


That's pretty much true of HTMX too (which is what GP mentions using). I mention Hotwire Native (different from plain Hotwire) because it makes it easy to wrap a web app as a mobile app. Then you can replace performance critical parts with native views, but keep everything else working through the web app portion. This is easier to maintain, albeit with the downside that everything requires network round trips. Depending on you use case, that may be an acceptable tradeoff.


Please write your own blog posts rather than asking us to read LLM slop.


Just curious, on what grounds do you call this slop?

I thought it was a perfectly cromulent article making a perfectly reasonable point.



This isn't an explanation, it's just a quote from the article.

Let alone an explanation on why it's "slop" rather than just AI (re-)phrasing etc.


Clarify exactly what you mean by "demographic collapse."



> In the aftermath of World War I, birth rates in the United States and many European countries fell below replacement level. This prompted concern about population decline.[8] The recovery of the birth rate in most Western countries around 1940 that produced the "baby boom", with annual growth rates in the 1.0 – 1.5% range, and which peaked during the period 1962–1968 at 2.1% per year,[13] temporarily dispelled prior concerns about population decline, and the world was once again fearful of overpopulation. After 1968, the global population growth rate started a long decline. The Population Division of the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UNDESA) has reported that in the year 2023 it had dropped to about 0.9%,[13] less than half of its peak between 1962 and 1968. Although still growing, the UN predicts that global population will level out around 2084,[81] and some sources predict the start of a decline before then.

In other words, the last time everyone got worked up over this, the trend reversed itself too hard within a few decades, and then reversed itself again. Meanwhile, over half a century after the "decline" started, we have over twice as many people as we had when it started, and the earliest projections for when growth will stop is another half century from now. I think there are a lot bigger problems we'll need to reckon with before then, and if we manage to remain stable by then, it seems like we have good precedent for reversing it fairly quickly.


I'm not so sure that global population growth tells the right story vis-à-vis declining birth rates in western countries.


As long as everybody is nationalist (not to say racist) and keeps borders closed to protect the homeland, those differences matter. Realizing that one thing people get worked up about (immigration) is a solution to the other thing they get worked up about (not enough kids!!1) would be a great insight.


Yes, but no one is really complaining about "not enough kids." They are complaining about not enough kids of their preferred skin tone. So they see immigration as an exacerbation.


I can't help but agree here. "Declining birth rate in the western world" just comes across as a dog-whistle to me. I guess I kind of only alluded to this myself with my response that they were being "weirdly cagey", and I wish I had been more direct like you were willing to, so thank you for this


[flagged]


Your juvenile insult is not appropriate here.

The world population has been increasing steadily and shows no sign of slowing down.

The dog whistle in question is the inordinate concern that certain groups show for the population of the "western world" specifically, which is not-so-secret code for white babies specifically.


Well, they were directly asked what they meant and replied with a link to a giant Wikipedia article. If they had a more specific point to make, they're being weirdly cagey about it.


What does any of that have to do with Dropbox?


The point is that we should be directing our energy in a direction that’s net useful for human kind which should translate into growth. Dropbox is not one of those because there are many viable alternatives.


If we stop chasing clouds, we'll have to go back to local offline storage!


Why is this scummy?


"This" being the post on Anna's Archive.

It basically says, "Don't pay the authors for their work. Please pay US for their work."


How do you know most people don't do this? All my e-book-reading friends buy physical and digital copies of books in addition to whatever they get off AA.


If you can be tricked into giving someone all your money when they politely ask for it, you weren't going to hold onto your money for very long.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: