Hacker Timesnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | miyuru's commentslogin

Any plans to add IPv6 support? NAT GW are costly and docker hub has full support.

currently reg.mini.dev does not have AAAA records. Did not check the blob storage endpoints.


Certainly something we can add, just not something any customers have wanted thus far.

reg.mini.dev is really a front end to Google Artifact Registry which already supports v6. I opened an issue for our devops team to enable it for us.

Thanks for the feedback!


internet is used by billions of people, not just you.

You sure you don't have this reversed? The average person uses the internet to watch tiktok videos and join zoom meetings, all of which is centralized. The people self hosting their NAS or minecraft server is a tiny minority.

> join zoom meetings

no reason this has to be centralised.

in fact, Jitsi uses p2p with WebRTC until a third person joins the call: then migrates the call to be relayed.

A really nice latency win.


maybe because centralised is the only way you can do it

didn't Scaleway also increase prices 1st of this month?

https://qht.co/item?id=47944914


> i'm currently using their hillsboro instances.

existing VPS will have the old price.

It get increased only if it is rescaled and for new VPSs.


ah okay.

but do you know any alternatives to Hetzner for US?


You may want to look at 3HCloud.

yes, I am using mimo code(free version) for the last 2 days. I gets the job done for me.

If I need to upgrade, the plan start at $6, so its a no brainer.


it looks like all AI is following the same pattern as GPT-3 again, building bigger models to achieve better results.


Which is actually good news if it still works


> There are times where a AAAA record points to an IP that doesn't respond, but the A record responds and so on > If it went down for months I wouldn't notice.

you are not alone.

I am building a service to monitor such events. usual up-time monitors mostly checks the v4 address.

https://v6monitor.com/tools/ipv6-check


Did you at least report it to scaleway, so they can fix the issue?


No, I did not bother because I don’t use IPv6 and I don’t plan to use it anytime soon.

Reporting an issue usually involves some effort, and the support may decide to follow up even if I say that I don’t need a fix. It’s better if someone who cares about IPv6 reports it.


SVCB DNS records


  getservbyname(3)


looks like so, the emojies are dead give away.

I am not against using LLMs, but the author should have validated the contents before posting.


If you look at the older article linked (https://www.potaroo.net/ispcol/2022-03/revocation.html), it's very similar and uses the same tick/cross, so I don't think it's AI generated.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: