> Users are always identified to you by email address, phone number or both...
An account system using phone numbers may have a negative impact to privacy. For some people a phone number is attached to a real name and address. Also it is not uncommon for a person to change their phone number from time to time.
>> Showing an interest in terrorist events: everyone.
What they meant by the question is not what you believe it to be... interest != concern. I would say almost everyone has a concern but not an interest.
I would hope this is just poor execution on the manufacturers behalf and will eventually realize that making the battery an upgradable module would be a great selling point. However, based on experience I don’t see manufactures wanting to sell better batteries when they can make it exclusive to newer models. I think after the proliferation of EV’s we will see a lot of aftermarket batteries with significantly better specs.
I would hope this is just poor execution on the manufacturers behalf and will eventually realize that making the battery an upgradable module
When does it ever work like this in the real world though? Planned obsolesce and all that. Even in this industry, replacement car parts cost far above the component price when the car was new.
Since Musk is not making electric cars just for the profits, maybe Tesla will produce replacement batteries with better specs at lower cost. Tesla cars are designed to have battery packs that can be easily replaced contra Apples recent devices. Tesla car batteries will be the first ones, at volume, that people with electric cars will want to replace. If Tesla sets the trend other car manufactures will be at a disadvantage if they don't follow.
One of the overlooked cool benefits of EVs imo, is that you can repurpose old batteries, even if they aren't suitable for the EV market. As a battery ages and loses capacity, say it goes down to only 50% of it's capacity when new, it may no longer be acceptable for use in a car but it could still be perfectly adequate as a back up power source in a house.
Right. So when you are calculating costs, you need to include how much you are going to get for your old battery at usedlionbatteries.com. Of course, the faster new batteries get cheaper and better, the less you old battery is going to be worth.
That's certainly true but I was mostly meaning to highlight the fact that as these batteries age, and may no longer be suitable for their original purpose, they could still be useful for a whole range of alternative purposes.
As the original battery owner I don't intend to get much for selling a used car battery, but it still seems quite cool to have it be repurposed for some other use.
Yes, it's against the interests of car manufacturers to do so. But i could see china encourage that open battery standard(among chinese companies only, behind closed doors) as a way to get market share of both cars and batteries.
> I would hope this is just poor execution on the manufacturers behalf and will eventually realize that making the battery an upgradable module would be a great selling point.
Older phones, e.g. Nokias would commonly had standardised, replaceable batteries. Sadly, this trend has gone by the wayside. I can imagine EV makers going the non replaceable battery route. Maybe in the future we'll have some popular open source EV+standard spec battery pack, the "build your own computer" version of an EV.
Back when I had a Windows Mobile smartphone the carrier I had controlled the updates. Upgrading from winmo 6 to 6.1 took months. I think allowing carriers to control updates will negatively impact user experience.
Interesting language. The comprehensions are a neat feature and similar to Python in syntax. No support for ternary or assignment operators. The lambda syntax is not very intuitive if you have no arguments and more than one statement to execute.
let e1 = {
return "e1 called!"
}
let e2 = -> {
return "e2 called!"
}
e1() has expected behavior but e2() does not and e2()() has expected behavior. Not sure why?
Just from looking at your example here, and not looking at the docs, I'd say that `{x}` and `-> x` both return a function which evaluates `x` and returns the result; so `-> {x}` is equivalent to `{{x}}`, i.e. it returns a function which returns a function which returns `x`.
