Hacker Timesnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | mceachen's commentslogin

12 year old me would have sold their skateboard AND their bike to have a magic Patiently Explain Anything And Everything To Me robot instead of the mostly-impenetrable-to-my-tween-brain software engineering books I had access to in my town.

exactly... I had a hard time learning in the 90's with whatever I could scrape together for tools and books with no adults or public school system to help me.

He discusses this and his sixpence wager here: https://youtu.be/pJgKYn0lcno

(Source: TFA)


No mention of auto renewal is made as far as I (and Claude) could determine.

Their OSS offer is first-hit-is-free.


At the same time, at least to me, the text reads like a transcript from one of their YouTube tear downs.


There are those times we may be seeing the source of LLM language training. I had the same reaction of sounding like one but agree it's likely not.


Before anyone downvotes this guy, spend some time on the official Apple support forum.

I can't point at a bug that I've seen addressed in subsequent OS releases.

Seizure-inducing HDMI flickering from Night Shift. Finder Trash not supporting put-back _sometimes_. Printers becoming permanently "paused" sporadically, or worse, very consistently. Mouse lag/stuttering because you used "the wrong USB port." Apple photos libraries corrupting themselves with no recovery paths.

It would be strictly better to just not have the forum, then shouting sorrows into the void would feel more solitary.


I hit issues in MacOS on a monthly basis, and have been for years.

Not once have I hit an issue that wasn't documented and left unresolved on Apple's for over 3 years.


Countless of issues are not being resolved. I stopped submitting detailed and reproducible bug reports a while ago.

I basically don’t care anymore. Timeline consistently pinkscreens my laptop.

I just don’t give a f anymore. I barely run any Apple software on my Mac.

The only reason I stop use it, is because I have not spent the energy into researching:

- performant + long battery laptop with a good build quality

- disk encryption + while on X attempts

- good trackpad

The rest, the os, the shortcuts, I can change or adapt.


Currently profitable? Many are old enough to have a generic, and are close to the cost of aspirin at this point.


Edited to say at the time. Yeah once people get started on these drugs their doctors keeps them on it.


I suspect an LLM would read the instructions more thoroughly than a human.

So if there are only brown M&Ms greeting you in your dressing room, most likely they were put there by a robot.


I drove a Scitex RIP (raster image processor) as my part time job in college. The CMYK (and if you were rich, N more spot colors) rotation degrees were held in religious fervor. Me: "These degrees seem random." Boss: "You are not to ever digress from those, they are the Only True Values" (and if you play with them in TFA you'll see it indeed becomes a moire mess with tiny tweaks, which would cost a ton in reprinting and delays).

It was mildly humorous that stochastic dithering (even with dot-gain compensation) was an option back in 1990, and produced much higher grade color reproductions, but clients wouldn't have any part of it, because it wasn't "the look" that I think they expect their readers expected.


I maintain a fork of sqlite-vec (because there hasn't been activity on the main repo for more than a year): sqlite-vec is great for smaller dimensionality or smaller cardinality datasets, but know that it's brute-force, and query latency scales exactly linearly. You only avoid full table scans if you add filterable columns to your vec0 table and include them in your WHERE clause. There's no probabilistic lookup algorithm in sqlite-vec.


You're absolutely right—sqlite-vec currently only supports brute-force search, and its latency does scale linearly with dataset size. We did some rough comparisons using its benchmark tools: on the SIFT dataset, latency was around 100ms; on GIST, it was closer to 1000ms. In contrast, with zvec's HNSW implementation, we get ~1ms latency on SIFT and ~3ms on GIST, while achieving recall@100 of 99.9% on SIFT and 97.7% on GIST.


FWIW "You're absolutely right" broadly declares "a human is not piloting the keyboard"


You are undoubtedly correct!


It’s the inconsistency that gets me. Very similar tasks, similar complexity, same code base, same prompting:

Session A knocks it out of the park. Chef’s kiss.

Session B just does some random vandalism.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: