In this specific situation I would say that if the part is under manufacturer warranty, then the retailer should either offer a refund at the price paid or assistance for the customer in getting the manufacturer warranty replacement. Expecting the retailer to replace the faulty unit when the *wholesale* price has changed dramatically is.. unfair. I'm sure many people would scream "cost of business" and perhaps they are right. But, if the retailer is making a good faith effort to resolve the issue in a manner that keeps the customer "whole", that should be the metric for both "legal" and "moral".

Playing with a hyper-spectral imager makes you rethink how we see things. I've talked about this before, but human vision essentially "low resolution" on the spectral bands. Using an HSI that "sees" in 4nm spectral slices from 350-1000nm is really interesting (Cubert Ultris X20 Plus). There's so much spectral information that we just totally miss. I really wish the equipment for capturing images at these higher spectral resolutions wasn't so expensive so we could see people experimenting with them on a large scale. The one I got to work with was more than a nice SUV and that's cheap in the space. The ones we looked at from Headwall that did something like 400-2500nm started at $250k. Those weren't even full-frame imagers like the Ultris, they were line scanning imagers. That massive cost jump was down to the fact that from ~1050nm+ you need much different hardware to capture spectral data.

If anyone is interested in some technical aspects of the "full frame" HSI I worked with, it's quite interesting. It had a 20MP Monochromatic Sensor that captured single-band 12-bit data behind an array of lenses that split the incoming spectral range (350-100nm) into 164 individual 4nm wide bands of light that hit 410x410px squares on the sensor. The sensor can capture from 350-1100, but the QE drops of really fast past about 850nm and the product limited the upper range to 1000nm. I'm sure I munged something there, but you should get the general idea. I highly recommend researching the space of HSI, it's fascinating.

Last thing to point out, when working with an HSI like this, one thing you can do is capture a "spectral fingerprint". Since you've gone from three bands on spectral intensity information to, in our case, 164 bands you have the ability to turn that high-density spectral data for each pixel into essentially a line graph. Using that information you can do matching against a database of known spectral fingerprints and identify materials and material properties really well. In the multi-spectra world you'll see this capability used to identify crop health. In the hyperspectral world you can identify so much more. For instance, it can see skin anomalies that aren't visible to the human eye. You can identify specific minerals in a picture of a bunch of rocks (you need up into the 2500nm range for this though). You can easily spot foreign objects on a conveyor of food items. Overall, it's a long list of capabilities and I'm certain there are many more uses we could discover if the imagers were cheaper. And if you are into the wider ML world (not just focused on LLMs I mean), you'll see ML Classification Models being trained on these spectral fingerprints as well.

Anyway, the "full-spectrum" is fascinating, especially when you are able to slice it thin.

FWIW, I still love to see the old BBS UIs and ANSI art. But that's probably just nostalgia talking.

FYI LLMs are great at generating the ascii art, so you can create real fun games and TUIs that look like old school BBSs.

We can remain grateful the kids haven't discovered how to use figlet in HN comments.

I find it slightly annoying and disappointing that the blocks saying what frameworks it's designed to export to aren't links to those frameworks.

I mean, why isn't this just the mandatory default going forward? Globally shared, unique bucket names always struck me as a horrible idea.

A few cover multiple states.

See: https://peter-horton.com/2022/12/30/zip-codes-zctas-and-zcta...

Even in the US, once you have a zip and a name the post office can often deliver mislabeled mail. Results my vary by region though.

You could maybe do it for some subset of countries, but it's not simple. And some countries don't have post codes.

Unfortunately you still need country first. But past that, the point stands well. You'll need to adjust the form based on the country, obviously.

For the US you can use zip-5 to prefill bunch of data and zip+4 practically fills it all out for a lot of addresses.

Each country has some particular nuance though, so it's only as simple as "zip first" or "postcode first" in some locations.

If it's non-trivial work, have the Agent distill it down to an ADR.