If you think it's a customer's phone and not Apple's, do you agree that customer should own EPIC account (be able to sell, transfer it, that EPIC can not terminate it)? I think it makes sense to apply the same logic either for both cases or for none.

What's abusive TOS? Aren't EPIC TOS abusive where the payments to EPIC are non refundable in many cases or that you don't own your account or that your account can be terminated any second without a notice?

Isn't it a free market where if you don't like TOS you just don't use the product?

As a user I love apple products for making payments safe. I can get a refund if the item I bought is not as advertised or I bought it by mistake, I don't need to figure out how to cancel a subscription, it's couple clicks to cancel for any subscription. I don't want apple to allow purchases outside the app as I'm afraid companies will leverage their power to redirect users outside of App Store to bypass those "payment safety" features that do not benefit them and will use fishy tactics to increase their profits.

> Every subscription service should have a banner on their pages saying signing up through iOS takes 30%.

Why do I as a user need this information? When I'm a on gas station, I don't see banners how much tax or fees I'm paying. I can find this information if needed, but total price is what I'd like to see in the first place.