Hacker Timesnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | kuschku's commentslogin

The operator decides which apps can interact with a given esim.

Wasn't this supposed to be a general purpose computer? Why can a service decide which apps I can use to access which features of my own device?


I guess Google introduced it for security reasons. You still can install eSIM within your own android or in operator’s app by just giving permissions. Unfortunately service cannot decided by its own so you are as a user staying in safety while using random app.

"security reasons" is such a vague phrase that just means "because some people are unable to use it correctly, no one can have it". That's only okay if it's a danger to others.

If only 5-10 people have ever tried to solve something in programming, every LLM will start regurgitating your own decade-old attempt again and again, sometimes even with the exact comments you wrote back then (good to know it trained on my GitHub repos...), but you can spend upwards of 100mio tokens in gemini-cli or claude code and still not make any progress.

It's afterall still a remix machine, it can only interpolate between that which already exists. Which is good for a lot of things, considering everything is a remix, but it can't do truly new tasks.


What is a "truly new task"? Does there exist such a thing? What's an example of one?

Everything we do builds on top of what's already been done. When I write a new program, I'm composing a bunch of heuristics and tricks I've learned from previous programs. When a mathematician approaches an open problem, they use the tactics they've developed from their experience. When Newton derived the laws of physics, he stood on the shoulders of giants. Sure, some approaches are more or less novel, but it's a difference in degree, not kind. There's no magical firebreak to separate what AI is doing or will do, and the things the most talented humans do.


That highlighted phrase "everything is a remix" was for a good reason, there's a documentary of that same name, and I can certainly recommend it.

At the same time, there are things that are truly novel, even if the idea is based on combining two common approaches, the implementation might need to be truly novel, with new formulas and new questions that arise from those. AI can't belp there, speaking from experience.


Supposedly it requires additional workarounds to run in safe mode, and doesn't work if the NVMe drive is attached to a RAID controller (whether that's in use or not).

I also wonder whether this feature will be locked to server and the little-known "pro for workstations" variants.


> doesn't work if the NVMe drive is attached to a RAID controller

well that makes perfect sense, if its a consumer or prosumer grade raid controller, to be honest.


I used to have an extremely cheap phone plan that had 500MB data, then 64kbps for the rest of the month.

You'd be surprised how far you can get with that. IRC works just fine (as long as you use Quassel w/ Quasseldroid), HN works well, so does reddit (via redreader). RSS readers and wikipedia work as well, and for general web browsing you can set up a readability proxy (basically Firefox' Reader Mode, but server-side). And of course email works really well, too.


Been there, done that, and all without the benefit of a home Internet connection. I also created a couple of scripts that I could run on my desktop computer to install new software or update my operating system. After running the scripts on my computer, I would wander over to the library with nothing more than my phone to download the packages along with grabbing some videos to watch offline.

The issue isn't really living with 500 MB/month of data. For most people, it will simply be knowing that you can do that. The next issue they will face is having the technical ability to actually do so. Then, once you've done all of that, the question will remain: will they be interested in the stripped down Internet. A lot of us who frequent HN may be since the results will still reflect our interests. There are people on IRC who we would want to talk to. There is a slant towards tech sites with RSS. And so on. That isn't going to be reflected in sites targeted at a general audience.


Sure, me and you and everyone here can open a shell connection and do everything with text and it'll work great on 64kbps.

Some of these guys have been locked up for 40 years straight. They're not doing all that extra stuff. They want to go on Indeed or Monster or YouTube. One job site I had to load on my desktop to find out why it wasn't working for them, only to discover the pages had a 250MB payload of random crap downloading, including videos.


The COTS solution for some web browsing is Opera Mini, which may still work? It also uses a proxy to prerender and compress websites, and worked ok at 2G speeds last I used it. It used to work well as a java applet and made the wider internet functional on feature phones. Very solid software.

But as a practical matter, what people rely on phones for are services that are app-based. Good luck completing a Venmo transaction or any amount of banking.


>Opera Mini

I just tried to look for this and all links I'm seeing just forward to the main Opera page


Opera Mini, like actual Opera, was killed when Opera was purchased and relaunched as another Chrome clone.

Unless you need to leave the rear seats when the electronic door openers don't work anymore. It's possible the parent was referring to that, which is to be fair not just a Tesla issue, but Tesla is probably the most extreme example.

And this is what it looks like for me: https://i.k8r.eu/CzluFg.png

> The music publisher may not expend the effort to have a lawyer send you a "Cease & Desist" letter to make you take it down because your personal website is small fish but they wouldn't ignore a popular website that tried to show all lyrics for free with no ads.

Exactly. Now what if there wasn't one popular website with all the lyrics, but a million different small fanpages?

That's what the internet used to be.


Re: Yellowdot, have you considered setting a LUT to the display that maps the color of the recording dot to black, then setting a LUT to every other window that maps the same color to a nearby similar color?

Not a macOS user, but I feel like that might still work.


It could, but there's no possibility to apply a LUT to a realtime framebuffer on macOS. But it would have been a clever solution if it was possible.

With this change, Android will not just send every app install to Google, but even require approval from Google before allowing app installs.

Which I also don't like, but at least that can be done offline. The signature could be verified on device without sending everything to Google. If they have to track the 20 seats for the hobbyist accounts then they have to be tracking every single install

But they're not. They're actually sending each signature to Google and asking whether that's been verified anyway.

Really? So all app installs on Android 17+ will have to be done online?

If I understand correctly, the F-Droid store itself would be possible to install without waiting period, as it's an app from a verified developer.

Would apps installed from F-Droid be subject to this process, or would they also be exempt? Could that be a solution that makes everyone happy? Android already tracks which app store an app originates from re: autoupdating.

Also: Can I skip the 24h by changing the my phone's clock?


> as it's an app from a verified developer.

Well that's if they go through the verification process, which does not seem like a thing they'd want to do - https://f-droid.org/en/2026/02/24/open-letter-opposing-devel...


If one verified app can install many unverified apps, either aurora droid or fdroid basic or one of the many other frontends would end up offering that feature quickly.

But there's been some comments that even that wouldn't be possible, every app would have to be verified individually, or be signed by a developer with less than 20 installs.

(Which of course then begs the question: Why not build a version of Fdroid that generates its own signing key and resigns every app on device?)


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: