Hacker Timesnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | johnydoe's commentslogin

I’ve been using https://sigmaos.com/ for the past couple of years, and it works very similar


What do you mean by remote connection? Do you want to transfer files? Do you want to stream and control the GUI? Something else? In the first case, SSH is probably the best solution. In the latter case, something like VNC might work across all platforms.


I actually live in this area, so imagine my surprise to see a guardian article about my little neighborhood, and it being posted on HN!


Nice! What do you do with your land?


Prose.sh is as minimalist as you can get it


No terms of service, no privacy policy (both are dead links), and nowhere is it mentioned why this is free or what happens with the uploaded files. Couple of red flags to me right there


I’m not familiar with their original pricing, can anyone list the changes?


Previously (prices are without VAT and the 0,50 € for IPv4):

    | Name | vCPU | RAM  | SSD   | Price  |
    |------|------|------|-------|--------|
    | CX11 | 1    | 2 GB | 20 GB |  3,29 €|
    | CX21 | 2    | 4 GB | 40 GB |  4,85 €|
    | CX31 | 2    | 8 GB | 80 GB |  9,20 €|
    | CX41 | 4    | 16 GB| 160 GB| 16,90 €|
    | CX51 | 8    | 32 GB| 240 GB| 32,40 €|
Now:

    | Name | vCPU | RAM  | SSD   | Price  |
    |------|------|------|-------|--------|
    | CX22 | 2    | 4 GB | 40 GB |  3,29 €|
    | CX32 | 4    | 8 GB | 80 GB |  6,30 €|
    | CX42 | 8    | 16 GB| 160 GB| 15,90 €|
    | CX52 | 16   | 32 GB| 320 GB| 31,90 €|


I seem to recall they had intel and and at same


…if you live in the US.


There’s https://simplelogin.io/, which is owned by Proton now, so similar in terms of privacy. You can get it separately, or as part of Proton Pass or Mail


That looks good, thank you. And being owned by Proton give me more trust, the other suggested here https://addy.io/ not that much.


Same here, it gives me structure if the amount of arrange code is large. It also gives me structure when writing, as it can sometimes be very tempting to mix act and assert statements


When I started at my current company 2 years ago we were doing a rigid form of scrum. Over time, I’ve been able to bend that with my teams towards something that works for them and the product they are working on, instead of the other way around. What we ended up with is closer to Kanban; we stopped sprints and sprint planning and replaced it with WIP rules, and pulling work on the board when needed. We refine stories as needed, which means we don’t spend more time in meetings than we absolutely have to to gain alignment. We've retained things from scrum we deemed useful, like the retrospectives, and some sort of regular alignment with stakeholders. Altough not part of scrum or kanban, we’ve exposed engineers more to customers, instead of internal stakeholders, which means the solutions we’re making are much closer to what customers actually need vs what a stakeholder thinks they need. Overal, the feedback from both engineers as well as stakeholders has been very positive, citing less meetings and more time to make an impact, as well as faster time to impact.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: