Hacker Timesnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | johng's commentslogin

I always think of one of the parts of The Animatrix when stuff like this is going on. Here's a video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cTLMjHrb_w4 (NSFW)

Humanity's War with Machines


I've been burned many times by supposed friends over the past couple of decades. I will no longer loan money to friends. I have been paid back about 10% of the time. It just ruins friendships.... luckily I have been in business with the same 2 business partners for almost 30 years. They have always been truthful and trustworthy, even through difficult times.

Someone's word and a handshake used to mean a lot more than it does now. It is sad to say and see :(


Crazy. They are budgeting $30M for that one grocery store, and he said he would build 5 total for $70M.... so how is the first one eating up nearly half the budget?

"Mamdani has proposed spending $70 million in taxpayer money for constructing his envisioned five city-owned grocery stores. " Source: https://www.ktsa.com/developer-commits-70m-for-five-municipa...


From the article, they want to adopt https://freeexpression.uchicago.edu/ -- which seems reasonable to me. Some of the other stuff does sound unnecessary.

Although, I will say, when our public schools here allowed walkouts to protest ICE (high schools), I thought it was shameful. Who at the school gets to decide what causes are worthy of allowing the walkouts that people don't get punished for missing school? Which causes are OK for the teachers to push upon students, who decides that?

If I were a parent, I'd be upset that they put my kid in a position to either participate in the walkout or face pressure from other students for "disagreeing" with them or supporting ICE. That's an unfair position for a student to be in because the school is trying to push a particular agenda.


School walkouts typically have nothing to do with the school itself, and certainly do not ask for it to be allowed. It is the kids who walk out. The schools typically treat it like any other unexcused absence.

The "allowed" aspect that you're ignoring is about punishment. Some walkouts are punished while others aren't, based on ideology.

More likely based in scale, in the sense of "they can't punish all of us."

The Chicago Statement reads: "Because the University is committed to free and open inquiry in all matters, it guarantees all members of the University community the broadest possible latitude to speak [and] write… The University may restrict expression that violates the law, that falsely defames a specific individual, that constitutes a genuine threat or harassment, that unjustifiably invades substantial privacy or confidentiality interests, or that is otherwise directly incompatible with the functioning of the University. In addition, the University may reasonably regulate the time, place, and manner of expression to ensure that it does not disrupt the ordinary activities of the University…

[T]he University's fundamental commitment is to the principle that debate or deliberation may not be suppressed because the ideas put forth are thought by some or even by most members of the University community to be offensive, unwise, [or] immoral… As a corollary to the University's commitment to protect and promote free expression, members of the University community must also act in conformity with the principle of free expression. Although members of the University community are free to criticize and contest the views expressed on campus, and to criticize and contest speakers who are invited to express their views on campus, they may not obstruct or otherwise interfere with the freedom of others to express views they reject or even loathe."

It's interesting which institutions or faculty groups have endorsed this or statements said to be substantially similar: https://fire.org/research-learn/chicago-statement-university...

Related debates here include the contrast between American support of more absolute freedom of speech and European support for broader limitations on speech (wehrhafte Demokratie, streitbare Demokratie), see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defensive_democracy and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_tolerance


It seems that a lot of elite campuses have become this way. Riots and protests to prevent anyone from speaking that doesn't agree with the prevailing thought on campus.

If the recent news about moving lots of soldiers from EU Nato installations back home is true, they'll have a ton of trained active military ATC's available to use in the US soon.

Wow this looks really neat. I am going to have to give it a try.

The video is a bit too long to watch but I will say that we have underground power lines in the US as well.

Seems like a no brainer to me. The original creator should be rewarded, not someone who clips it and reverses it and changes it a bit so it looks like they were the original creator.

Make it free, get users first, then figure out a way to offer perks, additions that they are willing to pay for.

I'm the same. I didn't even want to try it because I had to create an account before even seeing what it is.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: