Hacker Timesnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | honestlyreally's commentslogin

And here's Peter later talking about his doubts due to the AMT backdoor, with responses from Zooko.

https://twitter.com/petertoddbtc/status/861726383730503680


Not being that familiar with WoW, wouldn't it be classed as income more than speculation? These people grinded away at a game and earned "gold", now they want to convert it into a different currency.

Doesn't seem speculative for the people playing the game. Though for a trader it is.

Fail to see the difference between buy/sells on the company platform compared to a third party. Both could be used for speculation.


The difference from what I understand is an exchange vs a platform. A platform has utility, an exchange is investing. On an exchange you can trade one currency for another to ideally make a profit. On a platform you buy/sell as part of using the system.


An exchange is a platform...


Certainly minimises any anger for the 90m golden parachute given to the person at the helm now bailing out.


If anything, it turns the CEO into a victim.

"No CEO would be able to withstand a targeted attack from such a motivated adversary!"


Lots? Name one ico over $1m that has run off with others money?

Plenty of raisings based on spurious concepts but yet to see one actually go full scam, essentially these people have bs programming jobs for a few years until they admit their product is not desirable to anyone.

Most will fail, but at the very least the world will get some open source software from it.

More than could be said for all the dodgy mining explorers I've invested in.


Automatically assume anyone who uses all caps mid sentence hasnt thought through their point and is internet rambling. I stop reading everytime.

Quite sure there's a few of us, if you need to emphasise anything perhaps being more succinct is better than subscribing to this form of communication.


Thx for the tip. Sometimes a quick rant is more effective or all I've got time to post (vs a substantially edited essay).

I'm also disappointed in the formatting: I meant only the first sentence to have a mid-sentence all-caps. The list of "AND..." items was supposed to be just that, a list, each on it's own line with those as the bullet point leaders. Sadly, it refused to format as I entered it and mangled it all into one paragraph, and I didn't have time to take more than one shot at fixing/debugging it.

At least, though it was an imperfect post, there are those who liked it.


Plenty of western countries recently seem to realise that its far cheapear to take in educated immigrants rather than pay the cost of raising and educating a child. It's most certainly a trend.

Not justifying it, simply observing.


Virtually a prerequisite for anyone doing long range first person flying legally.


No proof whatsoever, but the ceremony and who was involved was most certainly known ahead of time.

Is prudence not prudent in matters such as these?


Messages are e2e, was under the impression that calls aren't yet.


According to https://blog.whatsapp.com/10000618/end-to-end-encryption, they are. Not sure who is wrong or lying. Or perhaps the"latest version" of WhatsApp will be prohibited.


I stand corrected.

Someone is obviously in the wrong here, have doubts whatsapp would ruin their business for a single country.


Perhaps the government only cares about who is calling who and for how long?


Aren't the whatsapp messages sent over the net? I.e. wouldn't it be the case that the government could only see the outgoing IP address? I guess if they were very well organized and working with the telecoms, they could then maybe see the outgoing IP and assuming that IP were on a telecom network they also controlled they could turn that into a person. This is all assuming that they could even figure out which encrypted outgoing packets correspond to calls (maybe this isn't too bad considering call streams would maybe have a fairly standard packet rate, etc.?).

Either way seems pretty hard without direct help from whatsapp.


It's Facebook that has access to this metadata.

> While the metadata is encrypted during transit, phone numbers, timestamps, connection duration, connection frequency, as well as user location are being stored on the company’s servers [0]

[0] https://arxiv.org/pdf/1701.06817.pdf


They've been known to use pocket calculators for ciphers and transmit over radio frequencies digit by digit.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: