Probably, but I've read Gruber's piece twice and I couldn't help but feel as if the talk was held by a bunch of young geeks coming from a Kickstarter project.
Maybe that's an Apple's new approach at PR but it sounds like they tried to downplay the impact of bad management that ultimately led to a failure that must have cost them millions.
This is a welcome addition. I expected JSON to become a first class citizens in REDISland for quite some time.
In fact, REDIS has always been my goto store for JSON data.
In 2013 I created a microservice[0] for accessing JSON data stored in native REDIS lists[1] via HTTP(S).
Yes, we have plans to support renaming soon and custom domains eventually.
At present, you could use CloudFlare or CloudFront as a way to host your HyperDev project on your own custom domain, but we don't have any special built in support right now.
The proposal only applies to local variables with non-null initializers. I'm pretty sure you can't autowire local variables with Spring, and they don't have initializers anyway.
Yeah, but that's a case where "var" is probably the wrong choice anyways, because of the non-obvious "human type resolution" -- i.e. if I'm a human reading this code, I can't obviously tell the type FooDao, where in simple cases like var path = Paths.get("/foo/bar/bonk") I can.
var isn't a dynamic type. var is a compiler-inferred static type. `var fooDao;` will refuse to compile because the compiler can't infer the type. `var fooDao = new FooDao()` will still have the type FooDao for fooDao, it is just inferred by the compiler instead of being explicitly declared by the programmer.
They needed to really hire non SF based techno geeks and advisors
Twitter should be led by someone who is strong in PR. PR is where Twitter has excelled most.
I believe neither Jack Dorsey nor Dick Costolo are even known outside of the tech industry, how can they manage a PR product if people barely knows them? Even Scooble would be a better fit than Jack Dorsey.
If I were Twitter I'd put in charge some well known public figure with connections in the media and movies industries.
So you're basically saying Twitter should be the next Yahoo!. That didn't work out so well for them. Besides, media people are the ones who actually like Twitter as it is now: top-down broadcasts in a controlled environment with ads and analytics.
If I were Twitter I would poach Amazon executives and make them flog the company into shape: lean, dogfooding, pushing out services to the tech community, and letting new paradigms emerge before co-opting them.
Yeah but it basically lived on contracts from traditional media and ad companies, which they proactively courted. When those markets tanked, so did Yahoo.
I think Twitter is in a different position because Yahoo! has never build a bi-directional connection between producers and consumers.
Obviously, that's not limited to media and ads companies. Any kind of industry is investing in PR.
I believe Twitter could succeed as a PR company but will probably fail as a tech company.
I think a lot of companies forced this because for a while the api permissions weren't granular enough when dealing with private repos on organizations. They added the "Third-party application access policy" sometime in the last year or two. I might be wrong though.
I can't believe that's [1] the best low-light picture they could find for their flagship mobile OS preview page.
It doesn't even add anything to the story:
Night Shift uses your iOS device’s clock and geolocation to determine when it’s sunset in your location. Then it automatically shifts the colors in your display to the warmer end of the spectrum, making it easier on your eyes.
I believe the Internet Archive is much less clear in this regard than public search engines. IA doesn't even have a clear takedown policy and no webmaster tools in place to give owners control on the archived content.
Their crowler does obey to robots.txt rules but if you want content to be removed permanently you have to ask politely by email and in my experience they simply block the site urls from being searched but they don't make clear at all if content was actually removed from their servers.
I think the idea of intentionally deleting content is pretty foreign to the Internet Archive. They're more likely to say "welcome to oblivion!" and set a timer for 70 years to show the content again.
The HDR effect on those images is gross. Also, the white balance looks way off (blueish) to my eyes.
I'd say that the overall image quality is not very good with reflections and poor resolution that severely limit the view of details.
Such a pity given the value of the assets on display and the incredible opportunity of accessing them with this tool.
Probably, but I've read Gruber's piece twice and I couldn't help but feel as if the talk was held by a bunch of young geeks coming from a Kickstarter project.
Maybe that's an Apple's new approach at PR but it sounds like they tried to downplay the impact of bad management that ultimately led to a failure that must have cost them millions.