I got these on Brave on two different computers. Disabling hardware acceleration fixed it. Both had Intel graphics.

The work on stboot and it's supporting components, including documentation was moved to it's own Gitlab: https://git.glasklar.is/system-transparency/core/stboot

I'm not sure what you mean. BTC is up 29x since 2017 while QQQ is up 1.8x

it went up 20x in 2017. i said late 2017. it peaked at 20k in dec 2017.

As pointed out above, complete fallacy. You are cherry picking a handful of dates that support your argument and those dates are completely arbitrary.

I'm not sure whether this is sarcasm, but in case it's not: I do.

Do you do this on top of investing U.S. equities for retirement? What % do you invest in equities versus crypto? What % of your net worth is exposed to crypto and what % minority are you in for perspective for doing so (aka, if 50% of your net worth is exposed to crypto, you're obviously in a very small niche group and "biased")

If you want to know whether your TPM is vulnerable I wrote a simple tool to check that: https://github.com/immune-gmbh/tpm-vuln-checker

How do I get continuous deployments without k8s? I value being able to deploy new code quickly, easily and fearless, especially in high speed low drag environments like startups. I don't see how I can do GitOps like workflows with any other tools that have the same large mindshare and breath of commercial, managed offerings.

you can do continuous deployments with anything lol, hell you can do CD with a runner and an ssh key lol

I'm not saying this is right for you or anyone else, but I just use a repo with some ansible / terraform in it. The repo has a CI job which runs the IaC and jobs done. Kubernetes does have a few tools which take this out of your hands but I guess the trade off is a few scripts you have to manage vs the complexity of kubernetes.

I not sure whether that satire. In case its not, most languages that allow inline assembly (like C) have an optional "clobber list" argument that tells the dataflow analysis of the compiler that your assembly snippet overwrites certain registers [1]. Inline assembly doesn't have target specific clobber lists because it's assumed that the code only works on one target and the programmer has to take care of making it work.

1: https://www.ibiblio.org/gferg/ldp/GCC-Inline-Assembly-HOWTO....

The System V x64 ABI is different from the Windows x64 ABI.

Impressive. I wonder how much of this was planned by CZ.

Baker and friends pulling out the money and Mozilla employees turning the NGO into just another bargaining chip in the US culture war seems more like a symptom of the rot that set in years earlier. Since the late 2010s there seems to be a distinctive lack of vision at Mozilla.

Building a browser engine from scratch is akin to building an operating system. Maybe the new Firefox will be 95% effective vs. an only 92% effective Chrome but I don't see how this effort advances the state of the web in terms of freedom and user choice meaningfully. Like others here I switched to Brave a few years ago. I think their strategy of building interesting things on top of Chrome is smarter. Imagine if Brave where the prevalent browser and I could send anybody an .onion or ipfs:// link at it would Just Work (TM). Same with their BAT token. Instead of restlessly shitting on the idea, let's imagine it does work and we have an alternative to ads for monetising content. I find this way more exciting than parallel rendering and Rust.

For a Phoenix and later Firebird user like me it's sad to see what happened to Mozilla, but the only constant is change.

Edit: grammar

Build something people use.