Most of the really experienced people at companies I have worked for where surprised when I asked about what they did and why. They somehow assumed someone else was supposed to be training me. They were the only ones who knew answers to particular questions I had. They were shocked and sometimes didn't believe me that I asked everyone but them first. I don't blame these experienced workers for not sharing their knowledge, someone should have told them, though, that they are expected to do it, there are no systems in place at most places. Most companies seem to believe that knowledge transfer just happens magically,or should.
I think in my case it did, I did learn from the experienced workers but that was apparently not the norm there. I hope you are right that that is what happens most places.
There's the boilerplate definition of feminism: the advocacy of women's rights on the grounds of political, social, and economic equality to men
And then there are articles like this. Each one invents their own take on the concept, and why they have a problem with it.
To me the real question is why so many people feel like whatever they interpret as feminism, they can just refer to as feminism. Why do so many people feel like they can gaslight feminism:
-"feminism is the advocacy of women's rights on the grounds of political, social, and economic equality to men"
-"No, that is not what feminism is, let me tell you what feminism is and why I hate it...."
That sounds really interesting. I have also thought about how "good-enough" AI could get a lot more done than many predict. I also like the idea of a Rube Goldberg equivalent of investment schemes and options to achieve certain objectives. Write a fun versions of it first, then do the business proposal. Good luck :)
I like the main point he is trying to make (which I see summed up by the cliche "think outside the box") but most of the ideas in this article are such stereotypical notions of turning everything on it's head: Aliens? AI taking over? Robots taking over? Us living in a simulation? Challenging the concept of rape? Can we stop pretending these are cutting edge and out there? Can we stop pretending these ideas don't have very old precedents? He has come up with unique ideas on these themes, but no he is not "ahead of his time" I would argue in many ways he is stuck in the past.
