Reckless Condensed?

I work under the assumption that the primary audience of everything I write at work is an AI. Managers will take what I send and have it summarized and evaluated by some chatbot or agent. (Of course, I cannot send them the summary myself.)

So like ATS checkers for resumes, I find myself needing an AI checker for my text.

Ultimately, we will have AI write everything for another AI to parse, which will be a massive waste of energy. If only there was some agreed-upon set of rules, structures, standards, and procedures to facilitate a more efficient communication...

If that is your manager, do so, sure. But make sure your manager is "such a manager".

If I was your manager, and you sent me your seventeen page AI generated thing coz you think I'm just gonna summarize anyway and I expect something long: You misread me.

I make a point all the time to everyone that won't listen, to not send me walls of text. I'm not gonna read them. I'm gonna ignore them, close your bug reports until I can understand them because you spent the time to make them short and legible. If you use AI for that, I don't care. But I better have something short and that when I read it makes actual sense and when I verify it, holds up. If I wanted to just ask AI, I'd do it myself. You have to "value add" to the AI if you want to be valuable yourself.

I agree. I send 2 sentence replies to most things my bosses boss sends me. He’s near retirement, dude doesn’t want me to send him a book. He knows the thinking under the work our team is doing is solid.

The only time I send something longer is if it’s a postmortem for some prod issue, which I write by hand.

I use AI every day, often multiple agents at once, but knowing when it’s appropriate and when I need to be the one thinking really hard about something.

I go through this with my vendor budgets and contract negotiations right now. We are encouraged to put all their proposals in AI and have it refute each point. I know for a fact they are putting my negotiations in their own AI and having it counter-propose my points. It's an arms race of my AI fighting against their AI. Where does it end.

It’s the Red Queen’s Race, where we all run as fast as we can to stay in exactly the same place.

If You Don't Know What You're Doing, Do It Faster

Where is uncertain, but how is: badly.

Ends when you tell them "this AI shit is ridiculous so we are choosing a different vendor"

I’m too lazy to tell the AI what I want to say, then copy and send its output.

I just type what I want to say and hit send. YOLO

> I just type what I want to say and hit send. YOLO

Made me smile. Perhaps the new term for making a human hand-written reply is that I didnt use AI … “I YOLOed it”.

I've seen people intentionally commit typos to give it that authenticity nod.

TFA actually does this; “relevent” at the disclaimer in the end, so I assumed it’s that authenticity nod.

This is the focus of my new startup, which uses a single-layer model to transform bullet points into bullet points. Please invest in IdentityMatrixLLM, LLC, etc.

I'll argue there's potentially a standards based advantage at the end when this all shakes out.

It will probably take a couple hundred years but I'm pretty sure I'm right about this :)

I'm also sure about things that will happen after me and my whole audience are dead.

I have a hard time trying to find any reasons for the S̶k̶y̶n̶e̶t̶ owners of the Skynet not to get rid of that walking bipedal inefficiency called human.

API or die /s.

Seriously, though, fuck that shit!..

You can fine-tune relatively easily in Unsloth Studio.

Was this a script using the API or something you asked Gemini CLI to do? I burn through Gemini CLI and Antigravity daily quotas in 2 hours on the $20 plan (AI Pro). Or maybe you used an older flash model?

I am asking because I am very frustrated with the new quotas and I am hoping to get more mileage out of my subscription.

Would you mind sharing what specific Qwen model you are running and how (Llama, vLLM, etc.)?

Don't worry. AGI will be vibe-coded too.

I am a pretty peaceful person, but working with agents frequently (daily) makes me furious. I wonder if the context switching you mentioned leads to more fatigue, which makes me much more irritable.

That's the case for me.

I still use agents for everything, but started on doing my best to single-task.

Think or plan while it's running.

Feels wasteful, but it's powerful.

Look up "wall-gazing meditation".

I quickly grokked the product and pricing from Exe's website. You need a page with less text, less scrolling and more specifics. Can VMs not autostop? Will an API call to a service on a stopped VM fail at the first attempt? Your pricing formula is simple but I don't want to do the math on my phone. How do payments work exactly (processor)?

Running Shellbox 24/7 is ~25% cheaper than Exe, with 2x storage but 50% of RAM. Exe seems to provide additional features (which I don't need). Not presenting this information upfront and in an easily digestible format makes me suspicious.

I dig the overall aesthetic and may give Shellbox v2 a try.

That's quite similar to the AI Studio's prompt. You are a world-class frontend engineer...